The Flaws In The Theory Of Evolution

The Theory of Evolution is the biggest staple of the anti-God, anti-creation belief. The Theory of Evolution suggests that all creatures evolved from a common ancestor, and that humans evolved from animals. Evolution also suggests that prehistoric humans were not fully evolved, which is why they weren’t intelligent enough to write things down. Evolution ties directly into the Big Bang Theory and the Prehistory theory, which is why I covered all three of them. Evolution, similar to the other two theories, are lies from the pit of hell, and every believer should know how to combat them.

Diversity and Complexity of Life

Evolutionists run into a major issue; all species are diverse. If every species came from one ancestor, it makes no sense for there to be such diversity. For example, the tongue of a bird wraps above its skull and is connected by a bone, while the tongue of a human is connected by the frenulum and starts in the mouth. Those are two completely different biological structures that have no relation to each other. If our “common ancestor” had a bird-like tongue wrapped over its skull, you then have to explain how we evolved to a completely different structure. And vise versa if our common ancestor had a human-like tongue.

Another major issue is reproduction. Our common ancestor had to reproduce somehow, so why are there diverse ways of reproduction? If our common ancestor was an amphibian, it means that they laid eggs. Creatures can only produce after their own kind, which makes it impossible for other different species to come from a common ancestor. There is no way all mammals, reptiles, fish, birds, marsupials, and amphibians came from the same common ancestor; each species reproduces differently and passes that trait to their offspring. The offspring of an amphibian will never evolve into a mammal and start reproducing like a mammal, and vise versa; that is scientifically impossible.

What Evolved First?

Every single one of the human organ systems and organs had to evolve. Our oldest common ancestors are believed to be fish and bacteria, so Evolutionists have to explain how we evolved from them. For fish, they have gills and breathe underwater. Why did some fish evolve into amphibians and come out of the water but others didn’t? How did scales eventually turn into human skin? How did gills eventually evolve into lungs? The point is that fish and humans have completely different genetic makeup, so to suggest that fish evolved into amphibians, who evolved into animals, who evolved into humans is absurd. There is no similarity between lungs and gills, nor is there any similarity between scales and skin; fish and humans are not related.

There Is No Evidence Of A Changing of Kinds

The biggest blow to evolution is the fact that there is no evidence of a changing of kinds, which is one species becoming another. If evolution was happening, we would see weird creatures, such as fish-like creatures with animal appendages. If we truly evolved, there would be proof of a creature having parts of multiple species; a transitional form. Evolution takes time, so fish didn’t immediately develop into amphibians; the process supposedly gradually happened. There should be fossils of hybrid creatures that evolved, but there aren’t. Species have adaptations to help them survive, but there is no evidence of a species evolving into another. There is no evidence of a transitional form, nor is there evidence of a changing of kinds, because SPECIES DIDN’T EVOLVE.

In Conclusion

The scientific probability of Evolution is extremely low; all signs point to a creator. Evolution is also scientifically impossible, as creatures produce after their own kind. When we tie in the fact that evolution is not scientifically observable, it is tough to prove that it actually happened. There are no transitional creatures, and the fact that each species has its own complex system does not help the theory either. There is also no proof that a changing of kinds happened, nor is it observable. I believe it can be confidently concluded that evolution is a lie. This is another theory created by Atheists, and some Satanists, to divert people from the truth of God and Creation. God created each species diverse and after their own kind; there was no evolution needed.

Thank you for reading, and always remember to stay vigilant!

2 thoughts on “The Flaws In The Theory Of Evolution

  1. hehe,

    nice try.

    I don’t know how I got here but you’re claims of things being “scientifically impossible” is a little baseless. It was not scientifically impossible, it literally happened, we have observation of it happening. we do have fossils of “changing kinds” (as vague and poorly defined that statement is lmao).

    You seem to have forgotten about mutation. Gills eventually evolved into lungs through random mutation over millions of years.

    My favourite proof for evolution are experiments of bacteria evolving to defeat anti-bacterial material. Here is a really fun video! https://youtu.be/plVk4NVIUh8 . Even if you don’t find it convincing it’s still a really cool video

    1. Hello,

      I understand your point-of-view and am not here to argue, rather I want to clarify some of the parts of the article you found vague.

      Firstly, “changing kinds” is in reference to one species becoming another, such as evolution claiming that some species of fish evolved into amphibians.

      Secondly, I do not deny that mutations occur, but I do not believe in the theory of macro-evolution occurring, in which one species evolved into another.

      Lastly, the video you sent is indeed interesting.

      Thanks again for reading the article, though we disagree

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *